Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: 2.0 kernels, tulip driver, crashes and reboots (long) | Date | Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:32:46 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
> Then why not use v0.89K instead of v0.89H in the kernel? Does the > K-version contain bugs that the H-version doesn't contain? At least to me, > K sounds like it is a newer version than H... (...HIJK...)
0.89H matches 2.0.36 its one we have detailed "experimental data" on as it were. I'm currently collating info on other versions.
> > 0.90 seems to work very well unless you have a VIA chipset. > > Of course, the best solution would be to find the reason for this.
Funnily enough people are trying
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |