lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Why is NFS in 2.0.3? slow
   Date: 	Mon, 23 Mar 1998 16:32:29 -0800
From: Jason Venner <jason@idiom.com>

I get 500k/sec for NFS traffic. This really sucks.
Doesn't seem to matter Read or Write.
I don't do TCP/IP. I don't set any block sizes, just use defaults on
the mounts.

That is pretty horrific, I do agree. I remember that when Olaf first
coded up the new NFS code he was able to get ~4MB/s NFS in the lab of
Linux boxes last year at Linux Expo. Whether he tuned parameters
etc. to get that, I don't know. If he did, we need to investigate our
default parameters a bit to see if we can find more suitable settings.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.041 / U:1.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site