Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 21 Mar 1998 08:14:27 -0800 | From | "David S. Miller" <> | Subject | Re: 2.1.90 network layer again not responsive |
| |
From: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 09:01:42 +0000 (GMT)
> Maybe acks for short (<mss) frames should be delayed _less_ than > long (=mss) frames.
Well Dave appears to have his own magic formula now and it works rather well in testing here. Who needs theory with a Dave Miller around ;)
Don't jinx me, I'm trying to implement TCP FACK even when the other end doesn't grok TCP SACK, only timestamps ;-)
Later, David S. Miller davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |