Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Mar 1998 22:51:41 -0800 (PST) | From | "Mr. James W. Laferriere Network Engineer" <> | Subject | Re: is gcc 2.8 safe to use yet ? |
| |
Hello Michael, egcs != gcc-2.8.x , that is a fact :-{ JimL
On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, Michael L. Galbraith wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, Marek Habersack wrote: > > > > > The XFree86 servers still don't run with a kernel compiled with a gcc 2.8.x > > > with the following command line: > > > > > > -march=pentium -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer <the usual align stuff> > > > > They do work with a kernel compiled with (gcc-2.8 based) egcs and pgcc... > > Any reason not to use those? > > > > LLaP > > bero > > > > Hi Guys, > > I've had no problems with X _running_ with any (read ALL) of the new > compilers under either 2.0.x or 2.1.x. I've also tried maxing out the > optimization with all of them.. makes the kernel slower but works. > > I'm currently running XFree-3.3.1 and KDE compiled with egcs-2.91.13, > configured for glibc. > > I haven't been able to determine if this is compiler related or not.. > but _something_ very uncool is going on since beginning to upgrade. > > As soon as I re-configured X for 'Thread-Safe-API' all libc5 X binaries > :(hundreds) stopped working. Looks like I won't be able to run Netscape > again until the source hits the web, as only freshly linked X binaries > run without segfaulting. > > ldd netscape > libXt.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x4000d000) > libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x40053000) > libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x4005c000) > libXmu.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXmu.so.6 (0x40073000) > libXpm.so.4 => /usr/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x40084000) > libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x40093000) > libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x4009e000) > libdl.so.1 => /lib/libdl.so.1 (0x40140000) > libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x40143000) > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x401ff000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40208000) > ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x402a8000) > > Core was generated by `netscape'. > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXt.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libSM.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libICE.so.6...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXmu.so.6...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXpm.so.4...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXext.so.6...done. > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6...done. > Reading symbols from /lib/libdl.so.1...done. > Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.5...done. > Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.5...done. > Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done. > Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done. > Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.1...done. > #0 0x40195957 in strrchr (str=0x7c2ae850 <Address 0x7c2ae850 out of bounds>, > ch=1703739421) > > That strrchr reminds me of some recent assembler discussions. Think I'll > check out that new constraints patch and recompile the universe.. > again. > > -Mike > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu >
, JimL +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | James W. Laferriere - Network Engineer - babydr@nwrain.net | | System Techniques - 25416 - 22nd S. - Kent, WA 98032 | | Give me VMS -or- Give me Linux -but- only on AXP | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ |-> Linux-Vax Port, Now in Progress !YAY! there's Progress To Report <-| |-> Please See http://ucnet.canberra.edu.au/~mikal/vaxlinux/home.html <-| |-> Maintainer: Michael Still mikal@blitzen.canberra.edu.au <-| +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |