lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: GGI debate and etc.
On Wed, Feb 25, 1998 at 02:00:21PM -0500, Nathan Uno wrote:
> On 25 Feb, Bill Broadhurst wrote:
> <snip>
> > As it should be. Graphics should be an add-on for those who want
> > to use them. Not forced on the rest of us who don't want 'em.
> >
> > I don't use X and I won't use GGI, so I will object to having either
> > in the kernel.
>
> Out of curiosity, do you use the sound stuff? If you don't/didn't use
> it, should it go in the kernel? Did you/would you object?
>
> What about the Amateur Radio stuff? Did you object to that?
>

Don't much like having it there either. Wasn't given a chance to
object. In any case, it's not on the same scale of waste. There are
already working video units in the kernel. There aren't working AR
drivers. Nevertheless, I would vote to strip the things out if there
were to be a vote.

But then I only have seven Linux systems here, so it's a small vote.

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Bill Broadhurst | Independent contract Engineer.
(619)296-3710 | BIOS, Firmware, & Diagnostics.
bbroad@CX492564-a.dt1.sdca.home.com | Finger for PGP 5.0 public key.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.086 / U:0.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site