Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Dec 1998 07:51:26 +1100 | From | Matthew Hawkins <> | Subject | Re: Y2k compliance |
| |
On Sat, 05 Dec 1998, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> > Hello Rik, I'm Sorry but 'cal' isn't a document displaying > a known starndards bodies authorship . > Also being common knowledge isn't a publication of the standard.
Where is the document "displaying a known standards bodies authorship" that that says if the is not coloured blue, but red, in the afternoon only, then tomorrow is going to be a fine day?
You don't need such legal crap for matters that are accepted as common knowledge.
> All I'm asking for is a known definition for the derivation of > leap year . There has has to be one somewhere . > Otherwise how did 'cal' get its definition ?
I believe this has already been posted in words, C preprocessor macros, double-dutch and swahili.
Please drop this thread before we start debating how long a leap year is if the earth starts rotating backwards around Uranus. It has nothing to do with the kernel.
-- Matt
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |