lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Y2k compliance
On Sat, 05 Dec 1998, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:

>
> Hello Rik, I'm Sorry but 'cal' isn't a document displaying
> a known starndards bodies authorship .
> Also being common knowledge isn't a publication of the standard.

Where is the document "displaying a known standards bodies authorship" that
that says if the is not coloured blue, but red, in the afternoon only, then
tomorrow is going to be a fine day?

You don't need such legal crap for matters that are accepted as common
knowledge.

> All I'm asking for is a known definition for the derivation of
> leap year . There has has to be one somewhere .
> Otherwise how did 'cal' get its definition ?

I believe this has already been posted in words, C preprocessor macros,
double-dutch and swahili.

Please drop this thread before we start debating how long a leap year is if
the earth starts rotating backwards around Uranus. It has nothing to do with
the kernel.

--
Matt

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.055 / U:1.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site