Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.1.131 isn't quite it for me | Date | Mon, 07 Dec 1998 14:28:02 +0100 | From | Nicolai Langfeldt <> |
| |
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) tastet: > > - NFS write performance it _horrid_. 50-100% worse than under > > 2.0.36. The server is Dec-Unix 4.0D. The machines are connected > > by 100Mbit switched ethernet. Using > > It will be for servers with 8K page size (ie DEC Unix, Solaris Sparc)
Ok. Is this a matter of design problem or closer to 'just a matter of programming'? If NFS is going to be that slow I'll either have to undertake to fix it or switch to a BSD :-I
The mounted rsize/wsize was 8k as under 2.0, that might not be optimal anymore.
Nicolai
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |