Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: 2.1.131: some quality thoughts | Date | Thu, 17 Dec 1998 14:03:43 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
> I know that it's ugly, but could "core" be renamed before 2.2 comes > out? Possible candidated might be "netcore", "kern[el]", "nucleus", > "base". A symbolic link could be added to tar archives to support the > old name if necessary.
Why
CVS can handle "core" just fine. In fact a cvs that ignores directories not files called core by default is just plain broken.
DaveM has been keeping the tree in CVS for a long time without problems, with remote cvs access and all the works
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |