Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Kernel Documentation - CVS ? | From | (Karl M. Hegbloom) | Date | 21 Jul 1997 02:43:42 -0700 |
| |
>>>>> Kevin M Bealer <kmb203@psu.edu> writes:
Kevin> 2. Documentation will always be a little out of sync, Kevin> anyone who experiments a lot with code knows you can't keep Kevin> it up to date for each tweak. If it is in a seperate file, Kevin> it can be kept coordinated and also versioning would be Kevin> seperate.
Isn't this the sort of thing that ChangeLog files and CVS checkin log entries are meant to address? Why isn't the Linux kernel kept in a CVS repository? What is the reasoning behind not doing so?
-- mailto:karlheg+sig@inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom) http://www.inetarena.com/~karlheg Portland, OR USA Debian GNU 1.3 Linux 2.0.30+parport AMD K5 PR-133
| |