Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Wed, 16 Jul 1997 12:59:25 -0500 (EDT) | From | edgy <> | Subject | Re: 2.0.31 : please! |
| |
On Thu, 17 Jul 1997, Marcus B wrote:
> Well think of it this way, 2.0 seems to be the only stable kernel > release that has a lot of work done to it, just look at 1.2 (13?) and > 1.0 (9), and with the really big things happening in the last year (new > found popularity of Linux), I'm amazed they got this much done. > Also if someone can donate a Web site I'll happily (do my best) to keep > a bug list site going, probably with a similar feel as LinuxHQ, how does > that sound? > > MABS -=marcus@cwi.net.au=- >
I could donate the web site, the machine, the 10 Mbit link, and the space, but I don't know enough about HTML to help with the CGI's and the HTML code for it.
The machine's running 2.0.30, but it's been pretty stable. :-)
Ben
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |