| From | (Winfried Truemper) | Subject | Re: Alan's bug catalogue | Date | 2 Jun 1996 21:52:49 GMT |
| |
Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk) wrote:
: Why do a lot of the socket destroy delayed people have an SMC ultra - chance : or driver bug
I have a
eth0: DC21041 at e400 (PCI bus 0, device 10), h/w address 00:00:c0:c2:e7:c6, and requires IRQ10 (provided by PCI BIOS).
and get those messages:
Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=0) Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=208) Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=208) Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=224)
: Unduplicated : ------------ : acct() disk corruption report.
I reported that. I have to admit that I cannot reproduce the error on my home machine (an old 486). [The server at university is too important to risk a disk-crash.]
-Winfried
|