lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: arm64: marvell: add solidrun cn9132 CEX-7 evaluation board
Date
Am 09.05.24 um 18:00 schrieb Conor Dooley:
> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:49:13AM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote:
>> Am 09.05.24 um 12:46 schrieb Josua Mayer:
>>> Add bindings for the SolidRun CN9132 COM-Express Type 7 evaluation board.
>>> The CEX is based on CN9130 SoC and includes two southbridges.
>>>
>>> Because CN9132 and 9131 are just names for different designs around the
>>> same SoC, no soc compatibles beside marvell,cn9130 are needed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml | 8 ++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
>>> index 74d935ea279c..538d91be8857 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
>>> @@ -92,4 +92,12 @@ properties:
>>> - const: solidrun,cn9130-sr-som
>>> - const: marvell,cn9130
>>>
>>> + - description:
>>> + SolidRun CN9132 COM-Express Type 7 based single-board computers
>>> + items:
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - solidrun,cn9132-clearfog
>>> + - const: solidrun,cn9132-sr-cex7
>>> + - const: marvell,cn9130
>>> +
>>> additionalProperties: true
>>>
>> It appears I will not be able to submit actual device-tree for this
>> board. Therefore when applying this patch-set, it may be skipped.
>>
>> I am not sure about the policy in this case,
>> if it is better to pick or skip.
> What do you mean my "not be able to"? Does the device exist? If it does
> then, I at least, have no objection to documenting a compatible for it.
Yes, it exists, and we do have a (low quality) dts for it.
I may not be able to do it in time for closing of merge window.

If it can go with actual dts, that's great!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-09 18:11    [W:0.055 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site