lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] clk: samsung: drivers for v6.10
From
Date
Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2024-05-06 22:54:10)
> On 07/05/2024 01:44, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2024-05-04 05:06:22)
> >> The following changes since commit 4cece764965020c22cff7665b18a012006359095:
> >>
> >> Linux 6.9-rc1 (2024-03-24 14:10:05 -0700)
> >>
> >> are available in the Git repository at:
> >>
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-clk-6.10
> >
> > I'm getting compile warnings. Is there a pending fix? Also, why is GS101
>
> I don't see any of these warnings. Neither local (W=1), nor on my CI,
> nor reported by LKP (which reported build successes for this branch).
> How can I reproduce it?

I ran this command

make W=1 ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.o

and I see the warnings. They're actually upgraded to errors.

>
>
> > describing clk parents with strings instead of using clk_parent_data?
>
> GS101 uses existing Samsuung clock framework, so that's how it is done
> there. There is nothing odd here, comparing to other Samsung clocks.

Ok. Is anyone working on migrating Samsung clk drivers to the non-string
way?

>
> >
> > In file included from drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c:16:
> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-gs101.c:2616:7: error: ‘mout_hsi2_mmc_card_p’
> > defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
> > 2616 | PNAME(mout_hsi2_mmc_card_p) = { "fout_shared2_pll", "fout_shared3_pll",
>
> I see indeed some unused variables and I will drop them but your
> warnings are not reproducible.

Weird! I use gcc-12.2 if that helps. I've been meaning to upgrade but I
also don't see much urgency.

I'll wait for the next PR.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 18:20    [W:0.461 / U:0.844 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site