lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 1/6] dt-bindings: ROHM BD96801 PMIC regulators
    From
    On 5/3/24 07:54, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
    > Hi Conor,
    >
    > On 5/2/24 19:20, Conor Dooley wrote:
    >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 02:59:50PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
    >>
    >> Krzysztof had some comments on the buck/ldo node names
    >
    > I think Krzysztof pointed out that the regulator-name property should
    > not match the data-sheet but the board. If he had something to say about
    > the node names, then I've missed his comment!
    >
    >> and on the
    >> initial value properties that I'm not sure if have been addressed, so
    >> gonna leave this series to him.
    >
    > Thanks for pointing out I may have missed addressing some of his
    > concerns. I though I fixed all issues he pointed to me but it may be I
    > missed some - or accidentally dropped some change(s) when merging fixes
    > from the 'experimental' branch to the 'simple'. I'll revise Krzysztof's
    > feedback to the RFC before sending the next version!

    You were right Conor. I checked it and yes, I omitted a few of the fixes
    to regulator bindings. Please skip reviewing this version of these
    bindings, I'll handle the rest of the comments in next one!

    Yours,
    -- Matti


    --
    Matti Vaittinen
    Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
    Oulu Finland

    ~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2024-05-27 18:14    [W:4.049 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site