lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] riscv: cacheinfo: initialize cacheinfo's level and type from ACPI PPTT
Hi Palmer,

Gentle ping...

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:03 PM yunhui cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Palmer,
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:29 PM Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@armcom> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 4/17/24 22:43, Yunhui Cui wrote:
> > > Before cacheinfo can be built correctly, we need to initialize level
> > > and type. Since RSIC-V currently does not have a register group that
> > > describes cache-related attributes like ARM64, we cannot obtain them
> > > directly, so now we obtain cache leaves from the ACPI PPTT table
> > > (acpi_get_cache_info()) and set the cache type through split_levels.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> > > index 30a6878287ad..e47a1e6bd3fe 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/cpu.h>
> > > #include <linux/of.h>
> > > #include <asm/cacheinfo.h>
> > > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > >
> > > static struct riscv_cacheinfo_ops *rv_cache_ops;
> > >
> > > @@ -78,6 +79,27 @@ int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
> > > struct device_node *prev = NULL;
> > > int levels = 1, level = 1;
> > >
> > > + if (!acpi_disabled) {
> > > + int ret, fw_levels, split_levels;
> > > +
> > > + ret = acpi_get_cache_info(cpu, &fw_levels, &split_levels);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + BUG_ON((split_levels > fw_levels) ||
> > > + (split_levels + fw_levels > this_cpu_ci->num_leaves));
> > > +
> > > + for (; level <= this_cpu_ci->num_levels; level++) {
> > > + if (level <= split_levels) {
> > > + ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level);
> > > + ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_INST, level);
> > > + } else {
> > > + ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level);
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size"))
> > > ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level);
> > > if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size"))
> >
> > Yes, looks good.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
>
> Could you help review this patchset? Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Yunhui

Thanks,
Yunhui

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 18:08    [W:0.095 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site