lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] igb: flower: validate control flags
Date
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf Of Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 8:14 PM
> To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@fiberby.net>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] igb: flower: validate control flags
>
> This driver currently doesn't support any control flags.
>
> Use flow_rule_match_has_control_flags() to check for control flags, such as can be set through `tc flower ... ip_flags frag`.
>
> In case any control flags are masked, flow_rule_match_has_control_flags()
> sets a NL extended error message, and we return -EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> Only compile-tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@fiberby.net>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>

Tested-by: Pucha Himasekhar Reddy <himasekharx.reddy.pucha@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 18:04    [W:0.046 / U:2.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site