Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 2 Dec 2020 13:53:00 -0500 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -tip 26/32] sched: Add a second-level tag for nested CGroup usecase |
| |
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:02:11AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > the user might only want subsets of {B, C, D, E} to share. For > > instance, the user might only want {B,C} and {D, E} to share. One way > > to solve this would be to allow the user to write the group cookie > > directly. However, this interface would need to be restricted to > > privileged users, since otherwise the cookie could be configured to > > share with any arbitrary cgroup. The purpose of the 'color' field is > > to expose a portion of the cookie that can be modified by a > > non-privileged user in order to achieve this sharing goal. > > > > If this doesn't seem like a useful case, I'm happy to drop this patch > > from the series to unblock it. > > Well, the traditional cgroup way of doing that would be to: > > A > / \ > T1 T2 > / \ > B C > > And tag T1 if you want B,C to share. > > So me the color thing reads like an end-run around the cgroup hierarchy.
+1
and please cc me on cgroup related changes.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |