lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux 5.10
    On Mon, Dec 14 2020 at 11:44am -0500,
    Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

    > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:02:47AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
    > > On Mon, Dec 14 2020 at 12:52am -0500,
    > > Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
    > >
    > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:31:47AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
    > > > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 03:03:29PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > > > > Ok, here it is - 5.10 is tagged and pushed out.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > I pretty much always wish that the last week was even calmer than it
    > > > > > was, and that's true here too. There's a fair amount of fixes in here,
    > > > > > including a few last-minute reverts for things that didn't get fixed,
    > > > > > but nothing makes me go "we need another week".
    > > > >
    > > > > ...
    > > > >
    > > > > > Mike Snitzer (1):
    > > > > > md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned
    > > > >
    > > > > Seems to be broken. This breaks mounting my raid6 partition:
    > > > >
    > > > > [ 87.290698] attempt to access beyond end of device
    > > > > md0: rw=4096, want=13996467328, limit=6261202944
    > > > > [ 87.293371] attempt to access beyond end of device
    > > > > md0: rw=4096, want=13998564480, limit=6261202944
    > > > > [ 87.296045] BTRFS warning (device md0): couldn't read tree root
    > > > > [ 87.300056] BTRFS error (device md0): open_ctree failed
    > > > >
    > > > > Reverting it goes back to the -rc7 behaviour where it mounts fine.
    > > >
    > > > If the developer/maintainer(s) agree, I can revert this and push out a
    > > > 5.10.1, just let me know.
    > >
    > > Yes, these should be reverted from 5.10 via 5.10.1:
    > >
    > > e0910c8e4f87 dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10
    > > f075cfb1dc59 md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned
    > >
    > > They were also both marked for stable@, and I just got email stating
    > > that you've staged them both for 5.4 and 5.9, but they shouldn't go to
    > > stable@. We need to reassess and fix during 5.11.
    >
    > Ok, will go push out a 5.10.1 with those reverted, but please, get the
    > reverts into Linus as soon as possible as well.

    Yes, will do, working on it now!

    Thanks,
    Mike

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2020-12-14 18:11    [W:3.044 / U:0.228 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site