lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/5] sched: Detect call to schedule from critical entry code
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:23:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 12:49:17PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Detect calls to schedule() between user_enter() and user_exit(). Those
> > are symptoms of early entry code that either forgot to protect a call
> > to schedule() inside exception_enter()/exception_exit() or, in the case
> > of HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING_OFFSTACK, enabled interrupts or preemption in
> > a wrong spot.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/core.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 2d95dc3f4644..d31a79e073e3 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -4295,6 +4295,7 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev, bool preempt)
> > preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_DISABLED);
> > }
> > rcu_sleep_check();
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(ct_state() == CONTEXT_USER);
>
> SCHED_WARN_ON() ?

Bah! That's exactly what I was looking for.

> No point in unconditionally polluting that path. Although, per MeL, we
> should probably invest in CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG_I_MEANS_IT :/

Because CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG is often used by default on distros?

Thanks.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-05 14:27    [W:0.353 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site