lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Allow the user not to build hw_breakpoints
On 04/27/2011 12:50 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:54:17AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Why do you have to be able to disable breakpoints to disable perf? That seems seriously backwards, especially since we had breakpoints long before perf...
>
> That started when we implemented breakpoints as counters. Then we realized that
> ptrace had its own scheduling that was somehow duplicating what perf was doing.
> So we have finally unified that under perf. The good point is that archs don't need
> to care much about ptrace breakpoints tracking, just the interface.
>
> But yeah the bad point is that dependency.

It really is very bad... without breakpoints, you lose almost all
debugging support.

-hpa

--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-03 17:39    [W:0.144 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site