![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 12:24:59 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 15:16:56 -0400 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:02:26 +0900 > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > Index: test-2.6.26-rc8-mm1/mm/vmscan.c > > > =================================================================== > > > --- test-2.6.26-rc8-mm1.orig/mm/vmscan.c > > > +++ test-2.6.26-rc8-mm1/mm/vmscan.c > > > @@ -1501,6 +1501,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_zone(int pri > > > */ > > > if (scan_global_lru(sc) && inactive_anon_is_low(zone)) > > > shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone, sc, priority, 0); > > > + else if (!scan_global_lru(sc)) > > > + shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone, sc, priority, 0); > > > > Makes sense. > > > > Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> > > > > Thanks. Poor old me needs to work out which patch this patch fixes. > It's always appreciated if others tell me :) > Maybe mine is against this one. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.26-rc8/2.6.26-rc8-mm1/broken-out/vmscan-second-chance-replacement-for-anonymous-pages.patch This adds inactive_anon_is_low() logic. Thanks, -Kame | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-07-05 05:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||