![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes: > > > * Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> wrote: > > > >> > + /* > >> > + * Wake up the high-prio watchdog task twice per > >> > + * threshold timespan. > >> > + */ > >> > + if (now > touch_timestamp + softlockup_thresh/2) > >> > wake_up_process(per_cpu(watchdog_task, this_cpu)); > >> > >> That defeats patch 1/3 and I think it can be dropped (#1). > > > > applied this updated patch to tip/core/softlockup. #3 didnt apply - > > could you send a delta patch against tip/core/softlockup please? You can > > pick it up via: > > > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README > > > > do: > > > > git-checkout -b core/softlockup tip/core/softlockup > > > > to check it out. > > Uhm, I see this patch is already in. Misunderstanding or did you fix > it up yourself? i applied and tested everything that would apply (modulo trivial conflict resolution) - but not all of your patches applied so if there's still anything missing please send a delta patch against this branch. (or against tip/master, which too has all these changes included) If it's "no further patch needed" that's fine - and if anything is missing please resend that bit. Ingo | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-07-01 08:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||