Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:22:05 +0200 | | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | | Subject | Re: m68k libc5 regression | |
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 01:48:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:37:59 +0200 (CEST) Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> > > I shall merge this fix into my tree (y'know - the one where memory
> > > management patches are hosted) and I'll get it into 2.6.26 and shall
> > > offer it to the -stable team. This will cause me to get collisions
> > > with the duplicated patch in linux-next but fortunately it is small.
> > > This time.
> >
> > So what's the appropriate way to handle this?
>
> Well at least please reply letting people know what's happening with it.
>
> Ask me to merge it and remind me that it's needed in -stable. Or just
> send the thing to Linus and -stable immediately.
I recall adding:
Cc: stable@kernel.org
will automagically tell the stable team when this is
merged and that it is a -stable candidate.
Sam
|  |