lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC,PATCHSET] Managed device resources
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 05:26:43PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>> Hm, but I guess without the follow-up patches for libata, it will not
>>> really get tested much. Jeff, if I accept this, what's your feelings of
>>> letting libata be the "test bed" for it?
>>
>> It would be easiest for me to merge this through my
>> libata-dev.git#upstream tree. That will auto-propagate it to -mm, and
>> ensure that both base and libata bits are sent in one batch.
>>
>> Just shout if you see NAK-able bits...
>>
>> Work for you?
>
> That works for me.

Great, I'll push it through Jeff.

> The only question I have is on the EXPORT_SYMBOL() stuff for the new
> driver/base/ functions. Tejun, traditionally the driver core has all
> exported symbols marked with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). So, any objection to
> marking the new ones (becides the "mirror" functions) in this manner?

Okay, will do so.

Thanks.

--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-08 05:09    [W:0.063 / U:0.604 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site