Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 7 Jan 2007 03:35:21 -0500 | From | Chuck Ebbert <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.16.37 |
| |
In-Reply-To: <20070104222517.GL20714@stusta.de>
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:25:17 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> There's already a CVE number for > "i386: save/restore eflags in context switch". > > Are there also CVE numbers for the equivalent x86_64 patch and > "x86_64: fix ia32 syscall count"?
Sorry, my Web access is broken for now so I can't check, but I believe that CVE number is for a different, older problem.
So AFAIK there are no CVE numbers for anything I sent (but there probably should be.) Generic Linux kernel developers don't have a CVE representative, so we depend on vendors to assign numbers and sometimes they don't.
-- "That's the problem with non-representational art: you can't tell which part offends you." --Stephen Colbert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |