Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 9 Dec 2006 11:43:33 +0900 | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] [PATCH] virtual memmap on sparsemem v3 [1/4] map and unmap |
| |
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:28:19 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> Generally we prefer to simply *require* that the function vector be filled > in appropriately. So if the caller has no special needs, the caller will > set their gen_map_kern_ops.k_pte_alloc to point at pte_alloc_kernel(). > > erk, pte_alloc_kernel() is a macro. As is pmd_alloc(), etc. Well, let > that be a lesson to us. What a mess. > > I suppose we could go through and convert them all to inlines and then the > compiler will generate an out-of-line copy for us. Better would be to turn > these things into regular, out-of-line C functions. > > What a mess. >
Thank you for review. I'll remove this default action.
-Kame
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |