Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:15:42 -0500 | From | Theodore Tso <> | Subject | Re: Linux should define ENOTSUP |
| |
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:59:48PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> writes: > > > Can you please quote chapter and verse (in POSIX) where it states that > > ENOTSUP and EOPNOTSUP have to be numerically distinct? > > <http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/errno.h.html> > "Their values shall be unique except as noted below." > (And there is no exception for ENOTSUP/EOPNOTSUP yet.)
Ah, but you're quoting from SuS, not POSIX. (Yes, I'm splitting hairs, but that's what standards are all about. :-)
- Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |