Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Dec 2006 12:06:10 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | ext2 future [was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.20] |
| |
Hi!
> ext2-reservations.patch > ext2-fix-reservation-extension.patch > make-ext2_get_blocks-static.patch > ext2-balloc-fix-_with_rsv-freeze.patch > ext2-balloc-reset-windowsz-when-full.patch > ext2-balloc-fix-off-by-one-against-rsv_end.patch > ext2-balloc-fix-off-by-one-against-grp_goal.patch > ext2-balloc-say-rb_entry-not-list_entry.patch > ext2-balloc-use-io_error-label.patch > > Not for 2.6.20. In fact it's unclear whether this should ever be merged - > ext2 is more an "example filesytem" nowadays. We'll see.
If ext2 is "example filesystem"... perhaps we should add "no journal" mode to ext3 or something? We still want high-performance, not-journalled filesystem, I believe. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |