Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:49:13 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] fsstack: Fix up ecryptfs's fsstack usage |
| |
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:38:07 -0500 Josef Sipek <jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> wrote:
> > When your patches are queued in -mm please do test them there, and review > > others' changes to them, and raise patches against them. Raising patches > > against one's private tree and not testing the code which is planned to be > > merged can introduce errors. > > Sorry about that. I noticed your fix, and the one by Adrian. And I did add > them to my fsstack queue.
you don't have an fsstack queue any more ;)
Please, I really do want developers to test their code in -mm once I've merged it. What happens if there's some nasty interaction between your patch and someone else's? We'll not find out about it and it'll get merged. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |