Messages in this thread | | | From | "Aucoin" <> | Subject | RE: la la la la ... swappiness | Date | Mon, 4 Dec 2006 08:39:24 -0600 |
| |
> PS: No need to put a copy of the entire message
Apologies for the lapse in protocol.
> The point you're missing is that an "inactive" page is a free > page that happens to have known clean data on it
I understand now where the inactive page count is coming from. I don't understand why there is no way for me to make the kernel prefer to reclaim inactive pages before choosing swap.
> In this case you're telling the kernel to go beyond its > normal housekeeping and delete perfectly good data from > memory. The only reason to do that is usually to make
The definition of perfectly good here may be up for debate or someone can explain it to me. This perfectly good data was cached under the tar yet hours after the tar has completed the pages are still cached.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |