lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 2/3] thermal/debugfs: Pass cooling device state to thermal_debug_cdev_add()
From


On 4/25/24 14:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lukasz,
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:02 PM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>
>>> On 4/23/24 19:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> If cdev_dt_seq_show() runs before the first state transition of a cooling
>>>> device, it will not print any state residency information for it, even
>>>> though it might be reasonably expected to print residency information for
>>>> the initial state of the cooling device.
>>>>
>>>> For this reason, rearrange the code to get the initial state of a cooling
>>>> device at the registration time and pass it to thermal_debug_cdev_add(),
>>>> so that the latter can create a duration record for that state which will
>>>> allow cdev_dt_seq_show() to print its residency information.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 755113d76786 ("thermal/debugfs: Add thermal cooling device debugfs information")
>>>> Reported-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 9 +++++++--
>>>> drivers/thermal/thermal_debugfs.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>>> drivers/thermal/thermal_debugfs.h | 4 ++--
>>>> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm trying to test it on my board and do the review, but faced issue.
>>> For some reason I couldn't apply that patch on the latest bleeding-edge
>>> branch.
>>> Could you help me in this please? Is there something missing in the
>>> patch set (like one more fist patch)?
>>
>> I messed up the ordering of patches (patch [2/3] should be the last
>> one in the series) and on top of that, you'll need a small rebase on
>> that patch.
>>
>> Sorry about this, I'll send a v2.
>
> Actually, the ordering was OK, but the rebase of the second patch is
> still needed. I'll send a v2.

Thanks, I've seen it. That v2 applies smoothly and runs on the board.
I'll test it and review.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 18:04    [W:0.071 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site