Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:23:54 +0100 | From | Jonathan Cameron <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 11/16] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs |
| |
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:08:30 +0100 Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:35:54 +0100 > Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com> wrote: > > > > From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 4:33 PM > > > To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>; Peter Zijlstra > > > <peterz@infradead.org>; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; > > > loongarch@lists.linux.dev; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > > arch@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > > > kernel@lists.infradead.org; kvmarm@lists.linux.dev; x86@kernel.org; > > > Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>; Rafael J . Wysocki > > > <rafael@kernel.org>; Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>; James Morse > > > <james.morse@arm.com>; Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>; Jean- > > > Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>; Catalin Marinas > > > <catalin.marinas@arm.com>; Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>; Linuxarm > > > <linuxarm@huawei.com>; Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>; Borislav > > > Petkov <bp@alien8.de>; Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>; > > > justin.he@arm.com; jianyong.wu@arm.com > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/16] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's > > > disabled but 'online capable' CPUs > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:54:38 +0100, > > > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 13:01:21 +0100 > > > > Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 11:40:20 +0100, > > > > > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:54:07 +0100 Jonathan Cameron > > > > > > <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* > > > > > > > + * Capable but disabled CPUs can be brought online later. What about > > > > > > > + * the redistributor? ACPI doesn't want to say! > > > > > > > + * Virtual hotplug systems can use the MADT's "always-on" GICR entries. > > > > > > > + * Otherwise, prevent such CPUs from being brought online. > > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > > + if (!(gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED)) { > > > > > > > + pr_warn_once("CPU %u's redistributor is inaccessible: this CPU can't be brought online\n", cpu); > > > > > > > + set_cpu_present(cpu, false); > > > > > > > + set_cpu_possible(cpu, false); > > > > (a digression) shouldn't we be clearing the enabled mask as well? > > > > set_cpu_enabled(cpu, false); > > FWIW I think not necessary. enabled is only set in register_cpu() and aim here is to > never call that for CPUs in this state. > > Anyhow, I got distracted by the firmware bug I found whilst trying to test this but > now have a test setup that hits this path (once deliberately broken), so will > see what we can do about that doesn't have affect those masks.
This may be relevant with the context of Marc's email. Don't crop so much! However I think we probably don't care. This is bios bug, if we miss report it such that userspace thinks it can online something that work work, it probably doesn't matter.
Jonathan
> > Jonathan > > > > > > > > Best regards > > Salil > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
| |