Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:15:47 +0200 (CEST) | From | Michael Matz <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/purgatory: Switch to the position-independent small code model |
| |
Hello,
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> Interesting. I thought gcc doesn't have problems here yet and was > >> talking to Matz on Thu about it and it seems he's forgotten about his > >> statement too that "you should simply stop using -mcmodel=large. Noone > >> should use it." :-) > > > > It may be so ingrained in my brain that I'm not _always_ saying it when > > talking about the large code model over a beer. And indeed I know of no > > particular problems with it vis GCC, > > Of course you do :).
:-P
> That bsc#1211853 I linked earlier. I.e. gcc-13 + > -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 + -mcmodel=large + some asm() expecting __FILE__ to be > constant (not true with the large model).
"asm() expecting $whatever" - clearly a user problem, not a GCC problem ;-)
Ciao, Michael.
| |