lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 6/8] netfilter: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 03:09:45PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, Joel Granados via B4 Relay wrote:
>
> > From: Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com>
> >
> > This commit comes at the tail end of a greater effort to remove the
> > empty elements at the end of the ctl_table arrays (sentinels) which will
> > reduce the overall build time size of the kernel and run time memory
> > bloat by ~64 bytes per sentinel (further information Link :
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZO5Yx5JFogGi%2FcBo@bombadil.infradead.org/)
> >
> > * Remove sentinel elements from ctl_table structs
> > * Remove instances where an array element is zeroed out to make it look
> > like a sentinel. This is not longer needed and is safe after commit
> > c899710fe7f9 ("networking: Update to register_net_sysctl_sz") added
> > the array size to the ctl_table registration
> > * Remove the need for having __NF_SYSCTL_CT_LAST_SYSCTL as the
> > sysctl array size is now in NF_SYSCTL_CT_LAST_SYSCTL
> > * Remove extra element in ctl_table arrays declarations
> >
> > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> # loadpin & yama
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 1 -
> > net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c | 1 -
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 5 +----
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c | 5 +----
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c | 5 +----
> > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c | 6 +-----
> > net/netfilter/nf_log.c | 3 +--
> > 7 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> > index 143a341bbc0a..50b5dbe40eb8 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -4286,10 +4285,8 @@ static int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init_sysctl(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > /* Don't export sysctls to unprivileged users */
> > - if (net->user_ns != &init_user_ns) {
> > - tbl[0].procname = NULL;
> > + if (net->user_ns != &init_user_ns)
> > ctl_table_size = 0;
> > - }
> > } else
> > tbl = vs_vars;
> > /* Initialize sysctl defaults */
>
> We are in process of changing this code (not in trees yet):
>
> https://marc.info/?t=171345219600002&r=1&w=2
>
> As I'm not sure which patch will win, the end result should
> be this single if-block/hunk to be removed.
Thx for the heads up. I have made a note of it in case this set ends up
being after yours.


>
> Regards
>
> --
> Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
>

--

Joel Granados
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-04-29 12:20    [W:0.135 / U:1.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site