Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:17:37 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] f2fs: drop usage of page_index | From | Chao Yu <> |
| |
On 2024/4/24 6:58, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:03:34AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote: >> @@ -4086,8 +4086,7 @@ void f2fs_clear_page_cache_dirty_tag(struct page *page) >> unsigned long flags; >> >> xa_lock_irqsave(&mapping->i_pages, flags); >> - __xa_clear_mark(&mapping->i_pages, page_index(page), >> - PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY); >> + __xa_clear_mark(&mapping->i_pages, page->index, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY); >> xa_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->i_pages, flags); >> } > > I just sent a patch which is going to conflict with this: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240423225552.4113447-3-willy@infradead.org/ > > Chao Yu, Jaegeuk Kim; what are your plans for converting f2fs to use
Hi Matthew,
I've converted .read_folio and .readahead of f2fs to use folio w/ below patchset, and let me take a look how to support and enable large folio...
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20240422062417.2421616-1-chao@kernel.org/
Thanks,
> folios? This is getting quite urgent.
| |