Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:24:16 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/141] 6.1.88-rc1 review | From | Guenter Roeck <> |
| |
On 4/28/24 05:32, Vitaly Chikunov wrote: > Greg, > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:53:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 03:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.88 release. >>> There are 141 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.88-rc1.gz >>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >> >> As Pavel reported, >> >> LKFT also found these regressions on 6.1. >> >> The arm build failed with gcc-13 and clang-17 on the Linux stable-rc >> linux.6.1.y branch. >> >> arm: >> * omap2plus_defconfig - failed >> * defconfig - failed >> >> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> > > I'm curious why v6.1.88 is still released nevertheless the reports of the > build regression on ARM32. >
It would also be interesting to understand why commit 0f4048e1a0c6 ("ASoC: ti: Convert Pandora ASoC to GPIO descriptors") was necessary. It doesn't immediately look like a bug fix.
Thanks, Guenter
| |