Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:32:10 +0700 | Subject | Re: Sending patches as eml message attachment? | From | Bagas Sanjaya <> |
| |
On 4/28/24 18:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 06:10:16PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >> On 4/28/24 16:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> Why would they be? >>> >>> Attachments don't usually work as you can not reply to them and comment >>> on the contents, right? Try it yourself and see. >>> >> >> OK. >> >> I experimented this by sending dummy patches to myself, as attachment. >> I replied to the patch using mutt and thunderbird. In mutt, the patch >> contents was quoted, whereas in the latter, it was missing. Hence, >> email clients are inconsistent on handling patch attachments. > > That is true, which is why we say "do not attach patches". It's as if > people assume we are new at this whole thing... >
OK, thanks!
-- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
| |