lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,mt2712: add compatible for MT7988
From
On 13.02.2024 19:18, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>>
>> MT7988 has on-SoC controller that can control up to 8 PWMs.
>
> I see a binding and a dts patch, but no driver patch, how come?

I believe that to avoid cross-trees patchsets (which are sometimes
tricky for maintainers) there are two ways of submiting such changes:
1. dt-binding + driver; then (separately) DTS
2. dt-binding + DTS; then (separately) driver

I chose later in this case as my personal priority right now is to deal
with all MediaTek DTS files.

Is that wrong or unacceptable?


> Also, what makes this incompatibly different with the other devices in
> the binding, like the 8183?

It can control 8 PWMs unlike any other SoC block except for MT2712.
It uses different registers than MT2712 thought.


> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml
>> index 0fbe8a6469eb..a5c308801619 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ properties:
>> - mediatek,mt7629-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt7981-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt7986-pwm
>> + - mediatek,mt7988-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt8183-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt8365-pwm
>> - mediatek,mt8516-pwm
>> --
>> 2.35.3
>>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 15:02    [W:0.213 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site