lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpufreq: cppc: Mark frequency invariance broken
    On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 1:34 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
    >
    > On 10-06-21, 13:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 9:58 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > There are few races in the frequency invariance support for CPPC driver,
    > > > namely the driver doesn't stop the kthread_work and irq_work on policy
    > > > exit during suspend/resume or CPU hotplug.
    > > >
    > > > A proper fix won't be possible for the 5.13-rc, as it requires a lot of
    > > > changes. Instead of reverting the patch, mark this feature BROKEN for
    > > > now.
    > > >
    > > > Fixes: 4c38f2df71c8 ("cpufreq: CPPC: Add support for frequency invariance")
    > > > Reported-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
    > > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
    > >
    > > Well, why don't we revert 4c38f2df71c8 instead?
    > >
    > > Is there any particular reason for retaining it?
    >
    > I was just trying to reduce the diff size here, since this feature
    > (which broke) was controlled by a CONFIG option, it looked like a nice
    > way of doing it.
    >
    > It was already reviewed and a diff over it should be easier to review.
    >
    > I can do a full revert if that's what you want.

    I would prefer a full revert TBH.

    Making a new feature depend on BROKEN feels like it shouldn't have
    been added at this point in the first place.

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2021-06-10 14:31    [W:4.504 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site