lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/7] net,rcu: convert call_rcu(sk_filter_release_rcu) to kfree_rcu
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 08:16:04AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:41:56PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 09:13:38 -0700
> > > >
> > > > > The RCU callback sk_filter_release_rcu just calls kfree(), so we use
> > > > > kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu().
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > >
> > > > I'm fine with all of these net conversions:
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> > >
> > > Thank you, Dave!
> >
> > Looking at the networking-only diffstat i suspect the best flow would be if
> > Dave pulled these from you into the networking tree?
>
> Oh, but kfree_rcu() is not upstream yet, right? So it has to be in the RCU
> tree.

Yep! So I either need to get kfree_rcu() upstream, then push up Dave's
tree, or I need to push them all up -tip. Either way is fine by me.

Thanx, Paul


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-03 21:37    [W:0.273 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site