Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 3 May 2011 12:33:49 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/7] net,rcu: convert call_rcu(sk_filter_release_rcu) to kfree_rcu |
| |
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 08:16:04AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > > > > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:41:56PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 09:13:38 -0700 > > > > > > > > > The RCU callback sk_filter_release_rcu just calls kfree(), so we use > > > > > kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu(). > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > > > > > I'm fine with all of these net conversions: > > > > > > > > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> > > > > > > Thank you, Dave! > > > > Looking at the networking-only diffstat i suspect the best flow would be if > > Dave pulled these from you into the networking tree? > > Oh, but kfree_rcu() is not upstream yet, right? So it has to be in the RCU > tree.
Yep! So I either need to get kfree_rcu() upstream, then push up Dave's tree, or I need to push them all up -tip. Either way is fine by me.
Thanx, Paul
| |